Posts Tagged ‘Manchester’

THE COALITIONS FIRST BIG MISTAKE

Friday, July 2nd, 2010

Less than two months in and the new coalition government has made its first major mistake in the area of economic development, strategic planning and business support.

The announcement that Regional Development Agencies (RDA’s) are to be abolished and replaced by Local Enterprise Partnerships (LEP’s) has largely been lost in the noise around the VAT hike, 25% cuts to public expenditure and impending tax increases. However, the collateral damage of the decision on RDA’s, motivated more by political dogma than political pragmatism, will be enormous.

It is fair to say that RDA’s across the country have had mixed reviews. But the performance of the Northwest Development Agency (NWDA), and its reputation among the regions business community, is excellent. Indeed, this was confirmed by an independent report carried out by Ekosgen and Lambert Smith Hampton, published this week, that found that the NWDA’S return on overseas investment is on target to be £30 for every £1 spent by 2013. Between April 2006 and March 2009, the NWDA invested £3.5 million in overseas projects that have so far generated more than £56 million in GVA. The report goes on to suggest that the figure will be £104 million in three years when all the foreign direct investment activity has fully matured.

In the run up to the election, Conservative spokesmen consistently promised that there would be wide scale consultation before any decision was taken on the future of the NWDA. I’m afraid that is one pledge that has been broken.

The claim that this new arrangement will mean more decisions being taken at a local level does not bear much scrutiny. Many of the powers and responsibilities currently held by the NWDA; business support, Inward investment, Innovation and managing Venture Capital funds; will not be devolved to Liverpool, Manchester and Preston but, rather, centralised in the corridors of Whitehall, administered by faceless civil servants many of whom think that people up north wear cloth caps and keep whippets!

And even where responsibilities are to be transferred to LEPs, who within the business community can honestly say that we have confidence in the capacity of local authorities to think strategically, agree on policy and deliver initiatives that will help drive our economy forward?

Manchester can take great comfort in the governance structure that is the Association of Greater Manchester Authorities (AGMA). It is a model that is rightly held up as a blueprint of good practice, and here we have a group of local councils and private sector partners that are comfortable in co-operating and expert in co-ordinating. Even here though, the political leadership cautioned against the abolition of the NWDA.

It is elsewhere in the region, however, that is of major concern. One would hope that the new leader of Liverpool City Council Joe Anderson, in his additional role as Leader of the Liverpool City Region Partnership, will be able to quickly pull together a strategy and framework among a group of local authorities who have found it difficult in the past to agree what day it is. The Mersey Tram scheme and the proposed Everton FC move to Kirkby are high profile projects that fell by the wayside and head a long list of public spats among the Merseyside political fraternity.

And what of Preston? At loggerheads over the Tithebarn project with neighbouring authorities; operating within a two-tier government structure and in a county that boasts more local councils than most of us care to remember . The idea that this bunch will be responsible for economic development in the future is, frankly, a frightening prospect. One can only hope that the districts will let Lancashire County Council simply get on with it, but I already hear rumours of not two but THREE LEP’s in the red rose county.

Of course we have to deal with the cards we are dealt; but this is a poor hand and one that may yet come back to bite the coalition government on the proverbial.

THE LEADERS DEBATE

Friday, April 16th, 2010

What a fabulous week it has been for the city of Manchester in terms of media profile. The first ever Leaders Debate, hosted at the Granada Studios, meant that the whole of the UK media descended on Manchester and helped cement its position as the UK’s second city.

As for the debate itself, I have to say I found it rather sterile. The format was stiff, the lack of engagement with and from the audience gave the whole affair a somewhat plastic feel and the outcome was rather predictable.

As Peter Mandelson commented afterwards, it was David Cameron’s to lose and he lost it. Such were the expectations of the Tory Leader, he really had to wipe the floor with his opponents to impress, and in truth he failed to land a punch. Gordon Brown is not known for his charisma and ability to perform in front of the television cameras, and so Labour can and will claim that he did Okay. And, inevitably, Nick Clegg was a clear winner. No pressure, no expectation and little profile before the evening, he would have had to work hard not to come out on top. He was slick and able to get away with ‘a plague on both your houses’ approach and the Liberal Democrats will be delighted today.

But, with two more debates to come, Clegg will find it more difficult as the other two start to feel the need to target him a little more seriously in the weeks ahead. I don’t think he will find it as easy as he did last night. For Team Cameron, they will be wondering whether it really was such a good idea to sign up for these debates. When their man was twenty plus points clear in the polls at the turn of the year, and it looked like he could walk on water, it was probably a no-brainer. But, with the gap in the polls narrowing by the day, the hung parliament scenario has been looking the more likely outcome – and last night has only heightened that possibility.

I’m expecting a more lively contest at the City of Manchester Stadium tomorrow, where the most important Manchester ‘derby’ in years is taking place. And how interesting that, for the first time in living memory, many Reds of the Liverpool variety are quietly praying for a United victory. A City win tomorrow would surely secure them fourth spot in the Premier League, denying their Merseyside rivals a place in next season’s Champions League. I wonder if there are any United fans who have given up on the league and, actually, wouldn’t mind their ‘noisy neighbours’ getting one over on Liverpool?

FRANK MCKENNA’S SPEECH TO THE DMIB LAUNCH EVENT

Friday, March 12th, 2010

Well, at last downtown comes to Manchester. After establishing our brand in Liverpool six years ago, and Preston three years back, I’m absolutely delighted that we have been able to bring downtown to the premier city in the north.

It was, I suppose, almost inevitable that we would end up here one day, because the very idea of downtown was, at least in part, born out of a conversation that I had with Tony Wilson in 1999.

Tony told me about a pressure group he had been involved in following the IRA bombing of the city in 1996. Other members of the organisation included Tom Bloxham, Peter Saville and Colin Sinclair. They called themselves the ‘McEnroe group’ – as a ‘you cannot be serious’ commentary on Manchester’s agencies response to the incident. He told me that the group came up with some alternative proposals and suggestions, some of which were subsequently taken on board, and that a good deal of the private/public sector partnership that we take for granted in this great city now, had started with that initiative.

There were a lot of ‘you cannot be serious’ moments in and around Liverpool’s regeneration in 2004 and in the run up to the capital of culture year in 2008, and downtown, in a way, became the city’s ‘McEnroe group’.

That we started out very much as a property dominated lobby group, that has developed into a cross sector business club that influences every level of government, whilst also offering what we consider to be the very best business networking environments, both through the events that we organise, the business to business introductions we facilitate and our exceptionally strong on line presence  is testament to the 400 plus companies that have supported us since our inception, and the great team that we have built in that time.

So what is Downtown?

We work with the key decision makers from fast growing businesses; we work with them collectively and individually to make sure that they get the very best profile and marketing opportunities; quality and diverse networking environments and business support that means they can grow their companies more efficiently and effectively.

Our networking offer is second to none, and we do breakfast events, lunchtime gigs, more intimate chairman’s dinners and ‘sexy’ networking’. In other words, we cater for everyone’s needs.

It is estimated that in the other cities where downtown operates, we have facilitated business deals worth literally hundreds of thousands of pounds since 2004.

On the political side, we have a dialogue with politicians at a national, local and regional level. Over the past twelve months our members have met with the prime minister, the shadow chancellor, the shadow home secretary and the minister for schools and education.

We hope we positively influence some of their policy thinking, and we hope we help them to understand issues that face the private sector on a day to day basis.

Of course we know that in this city the public sector, particularly its local authority is one of, if not the, best at forging strong, genuine relationships with the private sector that often go on to deliver change and success.

We also know that people like Tom Bloxham, Peter Saville and Colin Sinclair, once the great agitators, have become part and parcel of the Manchester establishment, which ensures that those partnerships remain and progress.

You only have to look at media city, and the planned regeneration of east Manchester and oxford road to see that Manchester is continuing to modernise, renew and regenerate.

We hope that we can bring some new people to the table from the business community and with them some new ideas. Certainly, if we do, we know that there will be an opportunity for those ideas to be put forward and listened to.

The principle reason for this, as I indicated earlier, is the way in which the city council operates here. I have nothing but admiration for Sir Howard Bernstein and his colleagues and the work they have done to make Manchester the great city that it is today.

I have known Howard for almost twenty years now, and I wondered how he would react when I went to see him to tell him that I was thinking of launching downtown Manchester.

I needn’t have worried. He encouraged me, introduced me to people who have become our first sponsors, and of course, has agreed to speak to us all this evening. I will be back in a bit to say a few thank you’s, but in the meantime, can I ask you to give a warm welcome to the chief executive of Manchester city council, Sir Howard Bernstein.

PHIL WOOLAS

Friday, October 16th, 2009

Phil Woolas, the Government Minister for the North West Region, was in good form at the Breakfast event hosted by DLIB last week, at the superb new offices of one of our corporate sponsors, Grant Thornton.

Among the many points he made came a suggestion that Liverpool should re-establish its own Stock Market in the city. A cracking idea that we will be exploring with Neil Blankstone of Blankstone Sington and others in the coming weeks.

He also confirmed that the Tram project has failed to be delivered due to poor local leadership; and he visited the Pall Mall site that we believe would be an ideal location for any civil service jobs that the Government plans to transfer from Whitehall to the North.

LEADERSHIP
Talking of leadership, and as Downtown plans to take the brand down the M62 next year, I have been spending a fair bit of time in Manchester recently.

I have written before about the co-ordination, cohesion and the ‘can do’ attitude of Manchester’s political establishment, and the more I see of the place, the more impressed I am.

The local government city region structure is organised through an organisation called AGMA (Association of Greater Manchester Authorities) which has private sector representation and is attended by all the leaders of the Manchester councils.

Its economic development policies and strategic planning, not to mention AGMA’s lobbying power at a national level, is both impressive and consistent and is in marked contrast to what appears to be a rather shambolic Merseyside group, which is, I am informed, hardly ever graced by the presence of the Leader of Liverpool City Council, Warren Bradley.

On my regular City Talk slot this morning, Warren called in to object to remarks I made about the Elected Mayor debate in Liverpool. In a rather heated exchange, he contended that the Council’s consultation on the issue has been extensive and there is no appetite among the city’s electorate for an elected Mayor. I would simply argue that a referendum should take place on the issue – and that will happen if a Conservative Government is elected in 2010.

TWO CHEERS FOR RAIL LINK NEWS

Friday, September 4th, 2009

There is no doubt it is great news that if and when Network Rail finds the £34 billion for its new high-speed rail link, Preston will be on the mainline.

It would be churlish not to welcome such a major investment and improvement on our doorstep and I certainly do welcome it.

But, like many commentators after last week’s announcement, I do have concerns about it especially if it comes at the expense of better connectivity between cities across the North – Liverpool, Manchester, Leeds and Newcastle, etc.

In this country we seem to have this rather unhealthy obsession with the South East and more specifically London, in as much as this rail link and so many other similar projects, seem to be able enabling ‘us’ to travel quicker to ‘them.’

Now anyone who knows me will know I am North West through and through, so perhaps I do speak with a degree of bias on this point, but I believe we need to reverse that pyschology.

This high-speed rail link should be seen as much about increasing traffic from London to the North, ‘them’ coming to ‘us’, if you will.

Potentially we have a great opportunity to offer equal quality service provision in so many sectors, often at a more competitive price, it is certainly a lot cheaper to set up in business on Preston docks than it is on the side of the River Thames.

And, if this new rail link comes off, people from London will be able to get to Preston in an hour and 13 minutes which is probably quicker than they can get to their own offices in London today, so it is not so fanciful to believe Londoners could commute to work in Preston in the future.

The one other point I was pleased to read about in the Lancashire Evening Post last week is that the rail link would bring about a new train station for the city, close to our wonderful motorway connections.

Preston railway station is perfectly located at the heart of the city centre and obviously architecturally very good looking, but it is in need of a real facelift.

If we are going to attract greater numbers of potential investors and customers from London, these facilities and the immediate city centre around the station needs a real investment to make it a proper gateway.

But that’s one for the future.